The Legality and Effectiveness of Smart Contracts, As Well As Its Impact on Traditional Concepts of Contract Law

Karwan Dhahir Saber1 and Rebin Ali Mohammed Ameen2

1Business and Management Department, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics
Tishk International University, Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq

2Director-General of Administrative and Financial Affairs,
Ministry of Natural Resources, Erbil, Iraq
Correspondence: [email protected][email protected]

Received: June 22, 2022 | Revised: September 05, 2022 | Published: September 20, 2022

 

Abstract

Although in the world of law, smart contracts are still a new concept, they have already given rise to many possibilities. common examinations of smart contracts, a modern innovation aimed at displacing traditional contract law. Some claim that smart contracts will completely replace traditional contracts while others claim that they will spell the end of contract law. This research investigates the role of “Smart Contracts,” a recently invented technology. What sets them apart is the use of computers to automate the execution of these legal agreements. This article further examines how smart contracts differ from traditional contracts from a legal aspect. It also explains the differences between strong and weak smart contracts, as well as how smart contracts work and fit into current contract law about revocation and modification. Since Smart Contracts are merely a new proactive self-help that politicians and judges should not restrict.

While some extreme examples of strong smart contracts may require regulation, courts and legislators should foster an environment in which smart contracts are considered separate types of contracts. As a result, a technique has been devised for dealing with any concerns that may arise because of the Smart Contract. For legal purposes, researchers distinguish between traditional contracts and smart contracts based on their strong and weak smart contracts. The study relied on an examination of already published information as well as any related papers obtained from public libraries, websites, and data from previously completed surveys, among other sources. Finally, based on comparative research, the study came to some plausible findings about the legality of Smart Contracts and made some recommendations.

Keywords: Smart Contract, Legality, Technology, Development, Traditional Contract


Download the PDF Document

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23918/ejmss.V3i2p14


Citation
Saber, K. D., & Ameen, R. A (2022). The Legality and Effectiveness of Smart Contracts, as well as its impact on Traditional Concepts of Contract Law. Eurasian Journal of Management & Social Sciences, 3(2), 14-25. https://doi.org/10.23918/ejmss.V3i2p14


© Saber, K. D., & Ameen, R. A, Published by EJMSS. This article is published under the Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC 2.0) license. Anyone may copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/


References

Almang, A. (2020). Smart contracts vs traditional contracts. Linedata.

Altay, H., & Motawa, I. (2020). An investigation on the applicability of smart contracts in the construction industry. In Workshop Proceedings (p. 12).

Bundesbank, D. (2020). Money in programmable applications: Cross-sector perspectives from the German economy, Informe de 21 de Diciembre.

Christidis, K., & Devetsikiotis, M. (2016). Blockchains and smart contracts for the internet of things. Ieee Access, 20/5.2022.

Dam, K. W. (1999). Self-help in the Digital Jungle. The Journal of Legal Studies, 28(2), 393-412.

Diathesopoulou, T. (2013). Traditional contract law principles as means for enforcing mediated agreements: Can they safeguard fair process in mediation? Accessed (2013, September 15)

Elisa, N., Yang, L., Chao, F., & Cao, Y. (2018). A framework of blockchain-based secure and
privacy-preserving E-government system. Wireless networks, 1-11.

Goddard, C., Fellner, A., & Ormand, R. A. (2011). Basic principles of contract drafting.

Goetz, C. J., & Scott, R. E. (1980). Enforcing promises: An examination of the basis of the contract. The Yale Law Journal89(7), 1261-1322.

Howell, B. E., & Potgieter, P. H. (2021). Uncertainty and dispute resolution for blockchain and smart contract institutions. Journal of Institutional Economics17(4), 545-559.

Kukkuru, M. (n.d.). Role of smart contracts on Blockchain explained.

Kuperberg, M., Kindler, D., & Jeschke, S. (2019). Are smart contracts and blockchains suitable for decentralized railway control? arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.06236.

Kirli, D., Couraud, B., Robu, V., Salgado-Bravo, M., Norbu, S., Andoni, M., & Kiprakis, A. (2022). Smart contracts in energy systems: A systematic review of fundamental approaches and implementations. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 158, 112013.

Levi, S. (2018). An introduction to smart contracts and their potential and inherent limitations.

Levi, S. (2018). An introduction to smart contracts and their potential and inherent limitations. Accessed (2018, May 26).

Liu, Y., & Huang, J. (2019, November). The legal creation of smart contracts and the legal effects. Journal of Physics: Conference Series Vol. 1345, No. 4, p. 042033. IOP Publishing.

Lipton, A. (2018). An introduction to smart contracts and their potential and inherent Limitations. Accessed (2018, May 26).

Pacific (2011), A. An Introduction to Smart Contracts and Their Potential and Inherent Limitations.

Poitras, G. (2009). The early history of options contracts. In Vinzenz Bronzin’s Option Pricing Models. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (pp. 487-518).

Raskin, M. (2019). Smart contracts implementation, applications, benefits, and limitations. Richard Leeming Partner (2017) (ibid 16).

Richard Leeming Partner (2017) ‘An introduction to smart contracts,> https://burges-salmon.com/news-and-insight/legal-updates/an-introduction-to-smart-contracts< accessed 20/5/2022.

Raskin, M. (2016). The law and legality of smart contracts. Geo. L. Tech. Rev. accessed 19/05/2022.

Szabo, N. (1997). Formalizing and Securing Relationships on Public Networks. First Monday, 2(9). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v2i9.548. Accessed date 2022/4/27.

Szabo, N. (1999, May). Micropayments and mental transaction costs. In the 2nd Berlin Internet Economics Workshop
(Vol. 44, p. 44).

Webber Wentzel (2019) ‘Smart Contracts vs Traditional Contracts: Same but Different https://webberwentzel.com/News/Pages/smart-contracts-vs-traditional-contracts-same-but-different.aspx’
Accessed date 2022/4/27.

Woebbeking, M. K. (2019). The impact of smart contracts on traditional concepts of contract law. Intell. Prop. Info. Tech. & Elec. Com. L., 10, 105.

Woebbeking, M. K. (2019). The impact of smart contracts on traditional concepts of contract law. Intell. Prop. Info. Tech. & Elec. Com. P2.

Xu, Y., Chong, H. Y., & Chi, M. (2021). A Review of Smart Contracts Applications in Various Industries: A Procurement Perspective. Advances in Civil Engineering.

Visits: 112