The Role of the US & UK: Towards the Independence of Kurdistan

Sheraz Ibrahim

Department of Law, College of Law and International Relations, Lebanese French University, Erbil, Kurdistan region, Iraq.

Correspondence: [email protected]

Received: November 28, 2022   Revised: February 13, 2023       Published: August, 2023

Abstract

The self-interest of outside actors obscures the vision of a better future for the Kurds. The determination of achieving Kurdish independence has been a rollercoaster due to the different stakeholders in the region and divergent interests of key players of the international community, most notably the United States (US). Yet the question of statehood in Kurdistan appears to be a little nuisance to the US and the United Kingdom (UK). The last time the British government had a determined stance with the Kurds in relation to Kurdish autonomy was in 1991. However, the British government found itself to be a close ally of Iran when the referendum was held in September 2017. This inconsistency may be related to a matter of ill-timing or a lack of support for Kurdish independence. In fact, the question of Kurdish statehood remains a greatly ambiguous and ambivalent topic. The Kurds have stood alone in their pursuit of secular and democratic values in a largely religious, fundamentalist, and anti-Western Middle East region. The international community, as well as international law inadequately supports an independent Kurdish state. This paper will neatly assess the importance of the US and UK’s approach towards an independent Kurdistan and the imprecise moves from these two powerful countries. This requires analyzing questions such as whether the US and the UK left the Kurds behind by not supporting Kurdish independence.

 

Keywords: KRG, US, UK, Kurdistan Independent, great powers, self-determination, International Law.


Download the  PDF Document

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23918/ejmss.V4i1p1


Citation

Ibrahim, S. (2023). The role of the US & UK: Towards the independence of Kurdistan, Eurasian Journal of Management & Social Sciences, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.23918/ejmss.V4i1p1


© Sheraz Ibrahim, Published by EJMSS. This article is published under the Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC 2.0) license. Anyone may copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/


References

Alexandrowicz, C. H. (Ed.). (1970). Grotian society papers: Studies in the history of the law of nations. Martinus Nijhoff.

Brownlie, I, (1970). An essay in the history of the principle of self-determination. In. Alexandrowicz, C.H., (Ed.), Grotian society papers: Studies in the history of the law of nations (pp. 90-99). Martinus Nijhoff.

Charountaki, M. (2017). The aftermath of the Kurdish referendum and its historic connotations. Harvard International Review, 39(1), 37-38.

Cooper, H., & Gordon, M. R. (2014). Iraqi Kurds Expand Autonomy as ISIS Reorders the Landscape. The New York Times, 29. https://nytimes.com/2014/08/30/world/middleeast/iraqi-kurds-expand-autonomy-as-isis-reorders-the-landscape.html

Egan, S. (2017). The Doctrinal Approach in International Human Rights Scholarship. (Publication No. 19/17). UCD Working Papers in Law, Criminology & Socio-Legal Studies, 1-17.

Entessar, N. (1991). The Kurds in Turkey: A political dilemma, [Review of the book The Kurds in Turkey: A political dilemma by M. M. Gunter]. Middle East Journal, 45(4), 684.

George, D. L. (1939). Memoirs of the peace conference (Vol. 2). Yale University Press.

Gunter, M. (1990). The Kurds in Turkey: A Political Dilemma. Westview Press.

House of Commons, Foreign Affairs Committee. (2018). Kurdish aspirations and the interests of the UK, Third Report of the Session 2017-19. House of Commons. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmfaff/518/518.pdf

Janik, M. (2012). The Kurdistan Region of Iraq: Achieving stability in a time of transition. Austrain Institute for International Affairs.

Lamb, A. (2008). Self‐Determination, wellbeing, and threats of harm. Journal of Applied

Philosophy, 25(2), 145-158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2008.00396.x

Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States, December 26, 1933.

Neurink, J. (2013, November 25). UK is Kurdistan’s partner of choice. Rudaw.  https://rudaw.net/english/business/24112013. Retrieved from March, 6, 2021.

Stansfield, G. (2014). Kurdistan rising: To acknowledge or ignore the unraveling of Iraq. Middle East Memo, 33(33), 1-16. https://brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Kurdistan-Iraq-ISIS-Stansfield-0731.pdf

Toperich, S., Ivanovic, T., & Zagros, N. (Eds.). (2017). Iraqi Kurdistan Region: A Path Forward. Center for Transatlantic Relations, The Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University.

Worthington, D. (2015, January 8). History of the Kurds. New Historian.    https://newhistorian.com/2015/01/08/history-kurds/  Retrieved from March, 5, 2021.

 

 

Grady, J. S., Her, M., Moreno, G., Perez, C., & Yelinek, J. (2019). Emotions in storybooks: A comparison of storybooks that represent ethnic and racial groups in the United States. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 8(3), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000185

Visits: 91